Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/15/14 1:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> The mailman fix is worse than the disease. I think the .INVALID fix is
> much better, because Reply-all will still work.
> 

>From the latest DMARC draft, section 8:

"If the RFC5322.From domain does not exist in the DNS, Mail Receivers
SHOULD direct the receiving SMTP server to reject the message."

So if a receiver that is implementing DMARC is faithful to the draft,
that won't work very well (nobody has gotten a TLD allocation for
.invalid, I hope?)

-Jim





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]