IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-02.txt> (Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)) to Internet Standard
  • From: PUTMAN, Tony (Tony)
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• RE: Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Benoit Claise
• RE: Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: l.wood
• Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-itat-report, "Report from the IAB workshop on Internet Technology Adoption and Transition (ITAT)"
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam Aldrin
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam Aldrin
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Call for Review of draft-iab-itat-report, "Report from the IAB workshop on Internet Technology Adoption and Transition (ITAT)"
  • From: IAB Chair
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: John Levine
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Black, David
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Black, David
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: [Recentattendees] ACTION: 2014 Meeting Venue Preference Survey
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-02.txt> (Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)) to Internet Standard
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• We need to add the ability to upload attachments to the IPR Filings.
  • From: TGLASSEY
• IETFer's work received ACM Computing Review
  • From: Aaron Yi DING
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: l.wood
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: tytso
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Black, David
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-cc-workshop-report-01, "Report from the IAB/IRTF Workshop on Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time Communication"
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: SDN and Routing Protocols
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Call for Review of draft-iab-cc-workshop-report-01, "Report from the IAB/IRTF Workshop on Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time Communication"
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Michael Richardson
• (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re[2]: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: mohammed serrhini
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Hector Santos
• re. DMARC - apropos cooperation, or lack there-of by yahoo
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• RE: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Paul Ferguson
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Seth Johnson
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Seth Johnson
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: l.wood
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Seth Johnson
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Seth Johnson
• Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• RE: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Logging into the datatracker
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: David Meyer
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Tim Wicinski
• Connecting code (open source and proprietary) with IETF standards
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Christian de Larrinaga
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: David Meyer
• Logging into the datatracker
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• IETF recommendations for Video Traffic Types
  • From: Ali Suleman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-07.txt
  • From: Black, David
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: l.wood
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Fwd: WHEN are CERF & CROCKER going to be Accountable...?
  • From: Techno CAT
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• SDN and Routing Protocols
  • From: Abhishek Verma
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Jelte Jansen
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Web of trust at Internet Scale
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: l.wood
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: l.wood
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Request for Feedback on RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [Internetgovtech] IANA changes process
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: [Internetgovtech] IANA changes process
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IANA changes process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• IANA changes process
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: Hector Santos
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt
  • From: Black, David
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Alex Ojeda
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Robin H. Johnson
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Robin H. Johnson
• DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Robin H. Johnson
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: t.p.
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Eric Gray
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: l.wood
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: Comments from the IAB on NISTIR 7977
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: An RFC7169 use case (!)
  • From: Ray Bellis
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re[2]: Security for various IETF services
  • From: mohammed serrhini
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: David Morris
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: l.wood
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: l.wood
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Rgd.ietf
• RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Hector Santos
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
• Re: CD-ROMs and secure access (was: Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark)
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• CD-ROMs and secure access (was: Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Pranesh Prakash
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: cdel.firsthand.net
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: Pranesh Prakash
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• New TLDs and software
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: David Morris
• Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: t.p.
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: ned+ietf
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Pranesh Prakash
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: Randall Gellens
• RE: Security for various IETF services
  • From: l.wood
• Security for various IETF services
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: An RFC7169 use case (!)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Liaison Statement Improvements SOW for Community Input
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-07
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Fwd: Re[2]: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Someone should do some work (was Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA))
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• An RFC7169 use case (!)
  • From: Thierry Moreau
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: RFC 7169 on The NSA (No Secrecy Afforded) Certificate Extension
  • From: Al Arsenault
• Reminder: Call for RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: RFC 7169 on The NSA (No Secrecy Afforded) Certificate Extension
  • From: Leaf Yeh
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Chaitanya Dhareshwar
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Rgd.ietf
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: RFC 7169 on The NSA (No Secrecy Afforded) Certificate Extension
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• IANA changes
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric Osborne
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric Osborne
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Mail System Reliability [was: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header]
  • From: Hector Santos
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC
  • From: Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
  • From: Mukom Akong T.
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re[2]: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: mohammed serrhini
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John Levine
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John Levine
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John Levine
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt
  • From: Black, David
• RE: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John Levine
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: David Morris
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: John Levine
• Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  • From: David Morris