John R Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Do you envision each operator maintaining its own whitelist, or one or more
>> public registries of them, or something else?
> On the assumption that we have reasonably good agreement about what would
> qualify for DMARC whitelisting, I'd think you'd want a small set (maybe only
> one) of public whitelists.
> If each receiver has to do its own whitelist, that means that nobody bug a
> big gorilla who can afford to create a whitelist can apply DMARC policies.
I don't understand whitelists.
Are you saying that gmail and yahoo have to know about my lists.sandelman.ca
before I can have gmail/yahoo members on my little local list?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
pgpWg8Ktr7MRN.pgp
Description: PGP signature