Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John R Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:49:46 -0500
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Xn1Q-b3aIUZvOCcLOvjkPIn30fA
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404170824350.2692@joyce.lan>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4

On 4/17/14 7:29 AM, John R Levine wrote:

Now I'm totally confused. How does that help me as a senderdistinguish between a good mailing list that is resending real mailfrom Yahoo and an evil mailing list that is sending phishes?

We're now *way* into technical discussion. Let's take those tohttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc shall we?


pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: ned+ietf

References:
- RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  - From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: John Levine
- RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: John R Levine

Prev by Date: RE: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
Next by Date: IETFer's work received ACM Computing Review
Previous by thread: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
Next by thread: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]