Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:39:01 -0700
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9FlCORWecFwdiAtWdtZFKaLCBXw
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <534FEA0A.4050607@qti.qualcomm.com>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 4/17/14 7:29 AM, John R Levine wrote:

Now I'm totally confused. How does that help me as a sender distinguish between a good mailing list that is resending real mail from Yahoo and an evil mailing list that is sending phishes?

We're now *way* into technical discussion. Let's take those to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc shall we?

Just sent you the formal request for a non-WG mailing list, so as Ned suggests (and I agree) the discussion can be separate.

-MSK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: John Levine

References:
- RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  - From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: John Levine
- RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Dave Cridland
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  - From: Pete Resnick

Prev by Date: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
Next by Date: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
Previous by thread: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
Next by thread: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]