Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, if the From says

From: goodguy@xxxxxxxxx <haha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

many UAs would show only goodguy@xxxxxxxxx as the sender,
but badguy could have passed DMARC, no?

This would not exactly enhance goodguy's reputation,
or Yahoo's for that matter. I realise it isn't the exploit
that Yahoo is trying to stop, but it suggests to me that
DMARC is only plugging one small hole in a very leaky dam.

Yes indeed.  The DMARC base document discusses this already, by admitting it's not a problem DMARC can solve right away:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04#section-17.4

It's also something that was brought up as a proposed work item for the IETF.

-MSK

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]