IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02
  • From: Alfred Hönes
• Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
  • From: Gerald Ash
• secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03
  • From: Carl Wallace
• Re: RFC levels and I-D "levels"
  • From: Alfred Hönes
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lawrence Conroy
• Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Thierry Moreau
• Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Contreras, Jorge
• RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Contreras, Jorge
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Russ Housley
• 3932bis approval
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Lars Eggert
• RE: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Eran Hammer-Lahav
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: John Levine
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: tytso
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Michael Montemurro
• RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
  • From: John-Luc Bakker
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: tytso
• RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
  • From: Dan Wing
• Please comment on IAOC candidates be appointed by the IESG
  • From: The IESG
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Last Call: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (RFC 2731 is Obsolete) toInformational RFC
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Scott Lawrence
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-07
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Paul Vixie
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Jabber,... at IETF Plenary Discussions (Re: IETF Plenary Discussions)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12 (was: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Review of draft-lha-gssapi-delegate-policy
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Dan Wing
• RE: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Dan Wing
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Background on IETF 79 Decision
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: FYI: SPDY
  • From: Dan Wing
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Apply Now to Join the ICANN Board, the Councils of GNSO and ccNSO, and the ALAC
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: RFC levels and I-D "levels"
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RFC levels and I-D "levels"
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: Jabber, ... at IETF Plenary Discussions (Re: IETF Plenary Discussions)
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Jabber, ... at IETF Plenary Discussions (Re: IETF Plenary Discussions)
  • From: "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Logging the source port?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Logging the source port?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Audio/webx
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Audio/webx
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Audio/webx
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: [recipe] Smart Grid "Bar BOF" Slides
  • From: Renato Golin
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FYI: SPDY
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• FYI: SPDY
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [recipe] Smart Grid "Bar BOF" Slides
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [recipe] Smart Grid "Bar BOF" Slides
  • From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Updated logistics and agenda for Smart Grid Bar BOF at IETF 76
  • From: Polk, William T.
• Re: [76attendees] Smart Grid "Bar BOF" Slides
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: OK, final NAT66 argument (Was: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technicalplenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: George Michaelson
• publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Scott Brim
• NroffEdit updated with new boilerplate
  • From: Stefan Santesson
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: John
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• IETF Plenary Discussions
  • From: Danny McPherson
• If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: Updated logistics and agenda for Smart Grid Bar BOF at IETF 76
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Virtual Open Mike for NomCom :-)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• IETF 76 Audio Streaming (Wed Thurs) plenary - Streamed on channel 8
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technicalplenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Stanislav Shalunov
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Stanislav Shalunov
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technicalplenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Stanislav Shalunov
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [secdir] secdir review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Room for Smart Grid Bar BOF on Wednesday night at IETF 76
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Stanislav Shalunov
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technicalplenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: John C Klensin
• Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
  • From: Stanislav Shalunov
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-05
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-mpls-and-gmpls-security-framework (Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Christian Vogt
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: OK, final NAT66 argument (Was: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp (BGP Encodings andProcedures for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Yakov Rekhter
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• IETF Flickr Group
  • From: Wes Hardaker
• Re: IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Hemant Singh (shemant)
• Re: Room for Smart Grid Bar BOF on Wednesday night at IETF 76
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• RE: Room for Smart Grid Bar BOF on Wednesday night at IETF 76
  • From: Polk, William T.
• Re: Room for Smart Grid Bar BOF on Wednesday night at IETF 76
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Room for Smart Grid Bar BOF on Wednesday night at IETF 76
  • From: Polk, William T.
• OK, final NAT66 argument (Was: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Important Information about IETF 76 Meeting Registration
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Dunn, Jeffrey H.
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Hemant Singh (shemant)
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Dunn, Jeffrey H.
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Hemant Singh (shemant)
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Dunn, Jeffrey H.
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Dunn, Jeffrey H.
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Eric Levy-Abegnoli
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
• RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Antonio Querubin
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Steven Bellovin
• Re: OK, final NAT66 argument (Was: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: OK, final NAT66 argument (Was: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: OK, final NAT66 argument (Was: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Background on IETF 79 Decision
  • From: Bob Hinden
• IETF 79 Announcement
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Nomcom 2009-2010: IETF-76 Office hours
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Fwd: (Forward to attendees) Meeting invitation: Smart Grid IETF "Bar" BOF
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Christian Vogt
• IETF 76 Streaming, Sunday update...
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Christian Vogt
• Update: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 76 November 8-13, 2009
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: John Levine
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comments: "Peer-to-peer (P2P) Architectures"
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp (BGP Encodings andProcedures for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jie Dong
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: mike amundsen
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Christian Vogt
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Lawrence
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Global Telecom Companies Announce A Standards Based Solution For Voice And SMS Services Over LTE
  • From: Ingemar Johansson S
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Christian Vogt
• Re: IDNAbis spec
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nikunj R. Mehta
• IDNAbis spec
  • From: Husni Al-Muhtaseb
• Python IDIQ Development RFP
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: IAOC Member Selection
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• RE: A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: David Morris
• A session for resolving my DISCUSSes
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: funding the IETF, was Circle of Fifths
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Sponsorship for FOSS developers
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Circle of Fifths
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Sponsorship for FOSS developers (was: Re: [codec] *draft* agenda)
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Circle of Fifths
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-11.txt
  • From: Kim Kinnear
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sasl-gs2 (Using GSS-API Mechanisms in SASL: The GS2 Mechanism Family) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sasl-gs2 (Using GSS-API Mechanisms in SASL: The GS2 Mechanism Family) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• ISOC Panel at IETF 76 Registration Information
  • From: Greg Wood
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: draft-nottingham-site-meta: registration too slow, opaque
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-nottingham-site-meta: registration too slow, opaque
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• ISOC Panel at IETF 76 -- Internet Bandwidth Growth: Dealing with Reality
  • From: IETF Chair
• Nomcom 2009-10: Request for additional TSV nominations
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Alfred Hönes
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-hammer-oauth (The OAuth Core 1.0 Protocol) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: IAB/IAOC/IETF Trust Minutes
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: SM
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: IAB/IAOC/IETF Trust Minutes
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: IAB/IAOC/IETF Trust Minutes
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Last Call: draft-hammer-oauth (The OAuth Core 1.0 Protocol) to Informational RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Eric Gray
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: draft-dusseault-http-patch (PATCH Method for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
• RE: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Greg Daley
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Dean Willis
• RE: Last Call: draft-hammer-oauth (The OAuth Core 1.0 Protocol) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eran Hammer-Lahav
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Eric Gray
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Eric Gray
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Eric Gray
• Re: Last Call: draft-hammer-oauth (The OAuth Core 1.0 Protocol) to Informational RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: IAB/IAOC/IETF Trust Minutes
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: IAB/IAOC/IETF Trust Minutes
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Scott Lawrence
• RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
  • From: Lars Eggert
• IAB/IAOC/IETF Trust Minutes (was: IAOC Minutes)
  • From: SM
• Re: Audio setup for conferences WAS:RE: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 76 November 8-13, 2009
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Request for comments on proposed changes to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Audio setup for conferences WAS:RE: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 76 November 8-13, 2009
  • From: Mehmet Ersue
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: AJ Jaghori
• Audio Streaming Info - IETF 76 November 8-13, 2009
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: draft-nottingham-site-meta: registration too slow, opaque
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• draft-nottingham-site-meta: put key bit (/.well-known/) in the abstract
  • From: Dan Connolly
• draft-nottingham-site-meta: registration too slow, opaque
  • From: Dan Connolly
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-11.txt
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery-11
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-09
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-09
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast (Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-04
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-09
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comments: "Peer-to-peer (P2P) Architectures"
  • From: Stanislav Shalunov
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-10
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-00
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-10
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-10
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-10
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-syslog-sign-28
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-06
  • From: mike shand
• Re: Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast (Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric Rosen
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-tables
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-tables
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-defs
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri(Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers)to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri(Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers)to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Dan Wing
• Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-13
  • From: Vint Cerf
• spd tunnel mode
  • From: Naveen BN
• SECDIR and OPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-11
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electrinic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alfred Hönes
• spd for tunnel
  • From: Naveen BN
• RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Contracts Awarded
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Steven Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Last Call: draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work (Renumbering still needs work) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-13
  • From: Ben Campbell
• The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [76all] Requesting a Non Smoking Room at the IETF 76 Overflow Properties
  • From: Sorin Faibish
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: SM
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Peny Yang
• Requesting a Non Smoking Room at the IETF 76 Overflow Properties
  • From: Alexa Morris
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: 答复: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for communityguidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: 答复: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for communityguidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• FW: [IP] AMA -- H1N1 CrRapidly; Predominantly Affects Young Patientsitical Illness Can Occur
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Scott Lawrence
• One more take on rfc3932bis
  • From: Alfred Hönes
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements, >(Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Maarten Vissers
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-idnabis-protocol (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: SM
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements,> (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements,> (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for communityguidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: ned+ietf
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements,> (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Patrick Suger
• RE: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for communityguidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Support for publication of draft-housley-iesg-3932bis
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: I-D Action:draft-davies-dtnrg-uri-find-00.txt
  • From: Bill McQuillan
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Margaret Wasserman
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: SM
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Patrick Suger
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Patrick Suger
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rui Costa
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirements for OAMin MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Francesco Fondelli
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts (Requirements forsupporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN) toInformational RFC
  • From: julien.meuric
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: Update on IETF 76 ANA Hotel Availability
  • From: Alexa Morris
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: David Morris
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (RequirementsforOAMin MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: ruiquan . jing
• Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirements for OAMin MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: ruiquan . jing
• Re: [CHANNEL-BINDING] Last Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Margaret Wasserman
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirements for OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Yoshinori KOIKE
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirementsfor OAMin MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: [CHANNEL-BINDING] Last Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Hiroshi Esaki
• Re: [IAOC] Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Michael Dillon
• Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Fred Baker
• The IETF and the SmartGrid
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [IAOC] Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: [IAB] Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Update on IETF 76 ANA Hotel Availability
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IAOC] Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: [IAOC] Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning afuture meeting of the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeetingof the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [IAOC] Request for community guidance on issue concerning afuture meeting of the IETF
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirements for OAMin MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirementsfor OAM in MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rui Costa
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements (Requirements for OAMin MPLS Transport Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sadler, Jonathan B.
• Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
  • From: Ahmad Muhanna
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Dean Willis
• Results of Venue Contract Survey
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: IPv4 addresses eaten by... what? (was: IPv6 standard)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [sasl] Last Call: draft-ietf-sasl-scram
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Hui Deng
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Update on IETF 76 ANA Hotel Availability
  • From: Alexa Morris
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Michael Dillon
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi (Right-to-left scripts for IDNA) to Draft Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Scott Lawrence
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi (Right-to-left scripts for IDNA) to Draft Standard
  • From: SM