Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >> Only if IPv6 were worth deploying. > Isn't this a little... late? A few hundred million devices are deployed > with IPv6, including all the commonly deployed versions of Windows and > IOS. By comparison, here's an overview of how an alternative might fare: Within IETF, maybe. As ITU, these days, is doing much better than IETF that IPng could better be discussed there or somewhere else. > 6. On the Tuesday of IETF80 the IANA switches to armageddon rules and > transfers the last ten /8s to RIRs. Can you say NAT and unicast class E? Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf