Pretty much all the emails I have received on this have suggested we should just go publish it now. To be clear, I was not talking about forming a WG to go do a standards track version of this. I was talking about clicking one flag in the data tracker and changing it from information to standards track and publishing the draft "as is" as standards track. The consensus seems to be: this document is important to get publish soon and is used by many other standards. Because of this, this draft is too important to publish it as standards track and we should publish it as informational instead. Anyways, I'm convinced that having this as a RFC is important and decided that I, like most other people, could care less if it was experimental or full standard as that will be close to irrelevant for what interoperability this enables on the internet. > > On 18 Nov 2009, at 15:41, Cullen Jennings wrote: >> Can someone walk me through the pro/cons of this being standards track vs informational? >> >> Thanks, Cullen >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf