Re: IETF Plenary Discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2009-11-17 09:12, Bob Hinden wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Reaction to the timers was quite mixed, going all the way from love to
>> hate; we never did a survey of the participants afterwards, I think.
>> We probably should have.
> 
> I was one of the folks who "hated" it.  I view the open mikes as the
> time for the community to speak to the leadership (IESG, IAB, and now
> the IAOC).  IMHO a timer sends the message that the I* does't want to
> listen to the community.
> 
> Note, I don't like the long rants either, but in this case the cure is
> worse than the disease.

I agree that the I* should listen to the community, but then the community
should regulate itself. Maybe we need a new tradition - something like a
polite hum when someone has been ranting for long enough, and a loud hum
when they have been ranting for too long?

    Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]