Scott, Good point. Not sure I completely agree on the interpretation of the current wording, but I agree that it is improved by your suggestion. -- Eric Gray -----Original Message----- From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Brim Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:34 AM To: Lars Eggert Cc: IETF discussion list Subject: Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate The idea is generally acceptable to me but: >> Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering >> Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute >> working documents as Internet-Drafts. While we're at it, these two sentences are contradictory. "Internet-Drafts are a specific thing" but "some Internet-Drafts may be something else". Since you have (reasonably) eliminated reference to areas and working groups, how about modifying this to say > The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) distributes its working > documents as Internet-Drafts. Note that other groups may also > distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. ? >> The list of current >> Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/. As Scott Lawrence points out this isn't completely true. How about: > Current Internet-Drafts are available at > http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/. ? swb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf