RE: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott,

	Good point.  Not sure I completely agree on the interpretation
of the current wording, but I agree that it is improved by your
suggestion.

--
Eric Gray 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Brim
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:34 AM
To: Lars Eggert
Cc: IETF discussion list
Subject: Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate

The idea is generally acceptable to me but:

>>   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
>>   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
>>   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  

While we're at it, these two sentences are contradictory.
"Internet-Drafts are a specific thing" but "some Internet-Drafts may be
something else".  Since you have (reasonably) eliminated reference to
areas and working groups, how about modifying this to say

> The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) distributes its working
> documents as Internet-Drafts.  Note that other groups may also
> distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

?

>>   The list of current
>>   Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/.

As Scott Lawrence points out this isn't completely true.  How about:

> Current Internet-Drafts are available at
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/.

?

swb
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]