Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You said:

"(Let me apologize to the non-US people in the IETF for the US-centric 
nature of this part of this post. It's necessarily US-centric because 
the example cited in the message I'm replying to was US-centric.

FWIW, I'm not a US citizen - I'm acturally Bermudian - so I am 
personally quite sensitive to the need to understand that the rest of 
the world is not a clone of the US.)"

Noel,

Since I am also not a US citizen, let me ask you a related question. 
Objectionable hotel clauses notwithstanding, some folks have argued 
that we should basically boycott China and not hold a meeting there 
for reasons ranging from Internet policies to Human Rights. Given the 
large and increasing number of Chinese engineers that participate in 
the IETF, what sort of message would we be sending by taking that kind 
of position?

Are we a US-centric organization? 

(That question is not just for you of course).

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxx  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]