IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-03
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- IETF Outcomes Wiki
- proposed charter for "NewPrep" WG
- RE: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (TrustAnchor ManagementProtocol(TAMP)) toProposed Standard
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- TSV-DIR review of draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-03
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks (ICMP attacks against TCP) to Informational RFC
- Cloud Computing for DoD and Government Summit
- secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-05
- Gen-ART LC/TC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext-06
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for theExtensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (Trust Anchor ManagementProtocol(TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (TrustAnchor ManagementProtocol(TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- Latest IETF Journal available now (Volume 5, Issue 3)
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Chatter
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- RE: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- From: Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- RE: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- RE: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- RE: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiationdetail
- Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (Trust Anchor Management Protocol (TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (Trust Anchor ManagementProtocol (TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Not All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: Not All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Malthus ( was RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?)
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Malthus ( was RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?)
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Internet Registration Escrow
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-mailto-bis (The 'mailto' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [iucg] IDNA2008 : planned appeal
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Smart Power Directorate
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0) -- lessons learned?
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- BOF proposals due soon
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [BEHAVE] General Comments on xlate-stateful-07
- Review of draft-jabley-reverse-servers-01
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Upcoming Datatracker User Interface Changes
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: Visas to China
- smartpower-interest@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: IETF 79 overlaps with IEEE 802 plenary in November
- IETF 79 overlaps with IEEE 802 plenary in November
- Re: Smart Power Directorate
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-05
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- ICSI Netalyzr measurement project
- Re: [IAB] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Gregory M. Lebovitz
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Visas to China
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- RE: Visas to China
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: Best way to document a packet protocol?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Best way to document a packet protocol?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- AW: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Smart Power Directorate
- Visas to China
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-05
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa vs foo.invalid
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Minutiae, was Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- RE: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- RE: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Minutiae, was Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- RE: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- China blocking Wired?
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis (Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- AW: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RFC Editor Transition Announcement
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTVApplication-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-15
- Re: Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 82 in Taipei
- Re: Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-04
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- RE: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: I-D Action:draft-levine-reserved-names-registry-00.txt
- Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: What is this with these confirmation messages?
- Re: Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF
- Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- What is this with these confirmation messages?
- Re: [New-work] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: separate out SINK and registry, was Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- need advice on reproducing code (Relax NG) from RFC 4287 (The Atom Syndication Format)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- need advice on reproducing code (Relax NG) from RFC 4287 (The Atom Syndication Format)
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- RE: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Most bogus news story of the week
- reminder about BOF proposals
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: your posting to IETF main list wrt References
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC
- Responses to IETF LC comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-03)
- Re: draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- RE: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTVApplication-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC
- From: Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: ISOC and W3C Announcement
- RE: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 81 in Quebec City!
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: Creating issues for "Related Active Documents"
- Creating issues for "Related Active Documents"
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-03
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-10 LC comments
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTV Application-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-08.txt
- RE: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security(TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
- ISOC BoT nominations
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- ISOC and W3C Announcement
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-krb-wg-preauth-framework (A Generalized Framework for Kerberos Pre-Authentication) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- IETF Meeting Survey
- Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- Re: Another thoughts on TRANSITIONAL
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: sctp multihoming query
- Re: sctp multihoming query
- RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- sctp multihoming query
- From: Sudhanva Mudigere Narayana Gowda
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: recent change to draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (in IESG)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- recent change to draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (in IESG)
- Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Question about Binary Encapsulation (Context: Packet Headers)
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- RE: NOT RECOMMENDED (was: Re: [TLS] Last Call:draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation)
- NOT RECOMMENDED (was: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]