Martin Rex wrote:
what do you want to say with this? That implementors should ignore at least half of the MUSTs and SHOULDs in IETF documents, because they don't make any sense, create unnecessary interop problems or are otherwise harmful -- and should not be in the document in the first place?
All in all, that pretty much sums up the current (and long standing) situation, IMHO.
Bob Braden _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf