RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just as an amusing side bar to the discussion ..you all know that any
wideband codec kills fax don?t you?


>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>  Of Arnt Gulbrandsen
>  Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:16 AM
>  To: codec@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
>  Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker; Mans Nilsson; Patrik Fältström;
>  kre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
>  
>  Mans Nilsson writes:
>  > But we are not running out of proposals for codecs to adapt. Both
>  CELT
>  > and SILK seem reasonable.
>  
>  Speaking for me as a user, MP3 and AAC are at least worthy of
>  consideration. Someone said on this list that they waste bandwidth,
>  but
>  VoIP's main problem for me as a user is low speech quality, not
>  unacceptable traffic. I hear fine voice quality on 128kbps mp3 radio
>  streams and really fine on 176kbps ogg; I'd like to have that for
>  phone
>  calls.
>  
>  rnt
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ietf mailing list
>  Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]