>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Abley <jabley@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Joe> On 2010-01-04, at 14:43, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'm not really particularly happy with Joe's two recent DNS drafts.
Joe> If I can help clarify anything, please let me know.
So, I think John is asking the questions well about the in-addr.arpa
plan.
For the sink.arpa, it would be good to explain why we want this name to
exist. Also, if your goal is that applications not have special logic
for sink.arpa you should *say* that: I read the draft assuming that it
was free license to applications to start doing special things with that
name and was starting to put together lists trying to figure out what
special application semantics motivated the work.
I do believe both sets of questions should be answered in the drafts. I
don't feel that strongly about it though; if the IESG would rather not,
that's fine with me.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf