Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-01-04, at 14:43, Sam Hartman wrote:

> I'm not really particularly happy with Joe's two recent DNS drafts.

If I can help clarify anything, please let me know.

> They give me the impression as a reader that a lot of context is being
> hidden from me and that the implications of the draft are being
> carefully obscured so that I as a reviewer not involved in the process
> won't know what is going on.  I suspect the actual cause has more to do
> with preventing arguments about goals when mechanisms can be agreed to
> or writing minimal drafts.
> 
> However I find the documents difficult to review; I do not consider that
> a good thing.

If you could me more substantive guidance as to where the documents could be improved, I'd be very happy. As things stand the best I can do is say "I'm sorry" :-)


Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]