The alternative would be to not use .local at all and insist on that approach as a means of avoiding ICANNs perceived perogatives. I think that would be a bad idea as the spec would not serve its intended purpose. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:35:11PM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > >> I want my personal machines to be part of the .hallambaker.com DNS >> domain and look for configuration data there. I want my business >> machines to be part of the .defaultdenysecurity.com domain and look >> for configuration data there. > > My reading of the draft actually allows you to do this anyway. So > what's the problem? > > A > > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Shinkuro, Inc. > -- -- New Website: http://hallambaker.com/ View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week, http://quantumofstupid.com/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf