On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:21:02PM -0800, SM wrote: > > "Note that this use of the ".local." suffix falls under IETF/IANA > jurisdiction, not ICANN jurisdiction." > > This draft mentions that the IETF has the authority to instruct IANA to > reserve pseudo-TLDs as required for protocol design purposes. There is > no action requested from IANA for ".local" in the IANA Considerations > section. There is in fact a request, it's just made indirectly. That was my complaint. I'm aware that the draft claims this is an IETF/IANA responsibility and not an ICANN one. I'm not sure I'm convinced, and I think the IESG should take that into account when making their decision about the draft. But I don't think it's a reason to hold it up anyway. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf