At 6:57 PM +0100 1/26/10, Martin Rex wrote: >The two MUST NOTs that popped up in -03 are in violation of rfc2119 section 6! ...as are about half of all MUSTs and SHOULDs in modern IETF standards. >Did anyone of you review the new sections in the -03 draft? Yes. >I do not think that rushing the document out of the door as-is >would be a good idea. This would set new lows for the level >of IETF Proposed Standard. This indicates that you need to read more standards-track RFCs, then. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf