Thomas,
I don't necessarily have an opinion about the proposed changes, but I don't quite understand the rationale. "Specification Required" is intended to allow for publication of documents outside of RFCs. It reqiures an Expert Reviewer to look at the document and make a determination about whether the spec is sufficiently implementable.
I do not understand this either, but I'll note that draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp has a ton of Standards Action IANA rules. It does not make sense to have such rules in a spec that itself is going for Experimental. So maybe Magnus should have said s/Specification Required/Standards Action/ in his e-mail... I would support the change of Standards Action rules to IETF Review.
Jari _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf