Brian West wrote: > I think CELT and SILK are both great codecs.. I was under the impression > that SILK ran at 32kHz and did internal resampling but that doesn't > appear to be the case. Either way we have six sample rates to pick from > between the two codecs giving you bandwidth vs quality options that > really do fit most needs in my opinion. 8,12,16,24,32 and 48kHz are > some great choices and we support all 6 native rates in FreeSIWTCH now. > > What other codecs did I miss that were submitted? We have BV16 and BV32 > in FreeSWITCH now too. The one you misses is SPIRIT's IP-MR codec. As you say, with the four codecs proposed so far we can cover a wide range of applications. There's a lot of potential for having a great codec come out of this. Jean-Marc _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf