Re: Most bogus news story of the week

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Friday, December 18, 2009 12:10 -0500 Marshall Eubanks
<tme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> What's so bogus about wanting to charge for traffic?
> 
> Where I would raise a flag is, charge whom ?
> 
> This sounds very much like the way that international long
> distance used to be done. That the Internet does not support
> that is to me, at least, not a bug but a very desirable
> feature.

But, from the perspective of many of the participants in the ITU
(and some of the countries), that old regime was profoundly
attractive: easy to regulate, easy to tax, easy to decide who
gets to carry traffic in and out of the relevant country, etc.
This goes hand-in-hand with nostalgia for various forms and
properties of circuit-switched networks, especially wrt QOS,
emergency services, and network management.   Probably that
means that precisely the things that contribute to your seeing
it as a feature are things they consider bugs... or at least
appropriate only for research networks.

And then we wonder why we have trouble communicating with the
ITU and assorted bellheads :-(

     john

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]