(2) I prefer *NOT* publishing the specification as-is, and instead
prefer to remove the 4 accidentally added rfc-2119-incompliant
imperatives from -03 back to the technically sensible semantics
which had the original WG and IETF consensus. The document editor
has proposed fixed text to make this an editoral change from -02,
so this change is not going to hold up the document.
-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf