Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-01-04, at 22:09, John R. Levine wrote:

>>> It would still be nice to put in an explanation of the motivation for adding SINK.ARPA when its semantics and operations, at least for clients, appear identical to whatever.INVALID.
>> 
>> I don't know that I have anything much to add to my previous answers to that question.
> 
> Well, at this point there seems to be no practical difference at all between the two, which returns to the question of why we need two different ways to do the same thing.

And again, I have no additional answers beyond the ones I gave before. I suspect the IESG have sufficient data on this particular point to be able to make their own decision without either of us repeating ourselves further.


Joe

http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=49793&tid=1262672174
http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=49795&tid=1262672094
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]