RE: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Rex wrote:

> I have never seen an IETF AD fight so passionately for the
> addition of rfc-2119-violating and unreasonable imperatives into
> a document such as Pasi is doing it now.

"Now"? "Addition"? 

I would like to remind you that version -01 of the document also 
very clearly prohibited sending the SCSV in secure renegotiation
ClientHello, and also used upper-case RFC 2119 keywords in that text.

Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]