Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) Date: Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:16:10AM +0100 Quoting Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > Mans Nilsson writes: >> But we are not running out of proposals for codecs to adapt. Both CELT >> and SILK seem reasonable. > > Speaking for me as a user, MP3 and AAC are at least worthy of > consideration. Someone said on this list that they waste bandwidth, but > VoIP's main problem for me as a user is low speech quality, not > unacceptable traffic. I hear fine voice quality on 128kbps mp3 radio > streams and really fine on 176kbps ogg; I'd like to have that for phone > calls. Not free, not fast, not possible to adapt. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I'm dressing up in an ill-fitting IVY-LEAGUE SUIT!! Too late...
Attachment:
pgpExgdbexT1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf