Since this last call was issued, there have been a further 340 messages posted to the TLS list about how to tackle this topic, a degree of activity some I-Ds may not see in their entire life cycle. This does suggest to me that consensus may yet to be reached on the best way forward for this topic and as such, the I-D is not yet ready to progess. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx> Cc: <tls@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:37 PM Subject: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security(TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard > The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG > (tls) to consider the following document: > > - 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension ' > <draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2009-12-14. Exceptionally, > comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-01.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19412&rf c_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf