Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-01-05, at 16:55, SM wrote:

> The diversity of operators has some advantages, i.e. not sharing fate.  The Introduction Section of this draft mentions that "The choice of operators for individual nameservers is beyond the scope of this document".  I don't know whether a change of operators is envisioned.

There is no plan to eliminate diversity of operators for either zone. See:

  http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=49851&tid=1262753935


Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]