Subject: RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) Date: Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:09:18PM +0100 Quoting Ingemar Johansson S (ingemar.s.johansson@xxxxxxxxxxxx): > So our interpretation of such proposed phased approach is that the WG > would be explicitely taking a decision to pursue the work if there are > no standardized codecs out there fullfilling the requirements. My interpretation of the situation is that this milestone is in most peoples rear-view mirror. The available codecs that could be rubberstamped are all missing some of the desirable qualities, ie internetability, licensing, sound quality, latency. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I feel partially hydrogenated!
Attachment:
pgpTSEbJILnrB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf