On 2009-12-16, at 10:55, JP Vasseur wrote: > Yes you are right, that rings a bell. That said, I think that with the > added text, this should be clear now. So if we changed it to "overload" in the earlier documents, wouldn't it make sense to make the same change here for consistency? Lars
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf