John C Klensin writes:
I guess the issue for me is that I want to see either
(i) Exactly one name allocated, with no hand waving
about registries and other, similar names.
+1, but I want to add a question: What is the actual difference between the proposed sink.arpa and the existing .invalid?
Arnt _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf