Russ, Yes, that's better, thanks. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andy: > > Does the following text strike a better balance? > > Although this preference cannot guarantee that the working > group will produce an unencumbered codec, the working group shall > follow BCP 79, and adhere to the spirit of BCP 79. The working > group cannot explicitly rule out the possibility of adapting > encumbered technologies; however, the working group will try to > avoid encumbered technologies that require royalties. > > Russ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf