Re: RFC levels and I-D "levels"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yaron,

> -          Only non-expired drafts should be directly accessible from the tools area, or in fact have a stable IETF URL.

Everything at tools.ietf.org is volunteer-maintained and unofficial.
That's why the I-D announcements contain the URL that they do, which
only allows you to recover the given version until it expires or is
updated.

If you quote http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-something or
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-something *without* the version
number, you get the latest version. That's what I usually quote for
external (non-IETF) use, so that the recipient will always see the
latest.

> Expired drafts will still be kept around, but will require a (freely available) "tools" login.

This would be highly inconvenient, and the Google cache defeats its purpose
anyway.

I think we have an ideal setup right now (for I-Ds that is; I have
given up worrying about the standards track, since the IETF is clearly
incapable of consensus on this aspect).

    Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]