Scott Brim writes:
Seriously, are you suggesting that it might be possible to cluster WGs
together so that people can stay for parts of the week?
I hadn't thought of that...
No, I was suggesting that if registrants explicitly say which WGs are
really interesting ("conflicts in that set spoil my trip") and which
are less interesting ("I'll attend those since I'm there anyway"), then
it may be possible to use more meeting rooms for a shorter period,
without spoiling people's trips.
It really depends on how many people would include forty WGs in the
"really important for me" set.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf