On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:49:36AM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote a message of 11 lines which said: > Therefore, I think it's safer to say that it's the NAT operator's > responsibility to log enough. Umpteen million web sites will > continue to use apache's common log format, so the NAT operator has > to log what's needed to work with that format anyway. How could it be possible? The only way I see for the NAT operator to be able to say that the customer X went to www.priv.no at 2241 UTC is to log not only the source-address/source-port mapping but also the *destinations*, which create obvious privacy issues (and would make the log *much* larger). _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf