> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Richard Barnes > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:33 AM > To: Brian E Carpenter > Cc: IETF discussion list > Subject: Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards > track tedious... > > > From the perspective of the world outside the IETF, this is already > the case. An RFC is an RFC is an RFC... +1. And if the IETF wanted to change that perception, the IETF needs to create a separate document stream -- which I think was the intent of the BCP and FYI document streams. But FYI and BCP aren't separate because the documents also have RFC numbers. -d > --Richard > > > On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > Who would like to adopt this idea: > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits- > > all-01.txt > > > > Brian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf