Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: Using slow_path to release stripe when mmdev->threand is null
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: Using slow_path to release stripe when mmdev->threand is null
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Timeout question
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Kevin Wilson <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: "Baldysiak, Pawel" <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Disk failure questions
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- "Found some drive for an array that is already active"
- From: Arnold Schulz <arnysch@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Timeout question
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Timeout question
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Timeout question
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- high read throughput storage server, take 2
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Kevin Wilson <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- More distinct events for mdadm - check vs. error case
- From: Karsten Hohmeier <karsten.hohmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 raid5d multi-thread
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: drivers: md: include "linux/vmalloc.h" in "dm-cache-policy-hints.c"
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: drivers: md: include "linux/vmalloc.h" in "dm-cache-policy-hints.c"
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] UAPI: include <asm/byteorder.h> in linux/raid/md_p.h
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: include "linux/vmalloc.h" in "dm-cache-policy-hints.c"
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] UAPI: include <asm/byteorder.h> in linux/raid/md_p.h
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] handle some bugs for REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] block: Check bio can merge before call attempt_plug_merge.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] block: Add REQ_NOMERGE into REQ_COMMON_MASK
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: John Schmidt <johnschmidt4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: Levente Kurusa <levex@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: John Schmidt <johnschmidt4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: aac_write: aac_fib_send failed with status: -12
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] UAPI: include <asm/byteorder.h> in linux/raid/md_p.h
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: changing parameters of a running array?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: changing parameters of a running array?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assembling array after disk failure
- From: Dan Knight <dknight1989@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assembling array after disk failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- assembling array after disk failure
- From: Dan Knight <dknight1989@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- aac_write: aac_fib_send failed with status: -12
- From: Steven Haigh <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: re-assembling arrays after severe controller hardware issues...
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- re-assembling arrays after severe controller hardware issues...
- From: Maarten <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: changing parameters of a running array?
- From: Lars Täuber <taeuber@xxxxxxx>
- Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can a running MD array name change?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- changing parameters of a running array?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can a running MD array name change?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Can a running MD array name change?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C600 raid
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C600 raid
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- C600 raid
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]raid5: set bio bi_vcnt 0 for discard request
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]raid5: set bio bi_vcnt 0 for discard request
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/24] md: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/24] md: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] how to proceed after bad raid5 reshape
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Question] how to proceed after bad raid5 reshape
- From: Dan Knight <dknight1989@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when md_set_badblocks.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: "DeGon, Michael J" <michael.j.degon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Using array without initializing
- From: Hans-Joachim Baader <hjb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when md_set_badblocks.
- From: ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed raid5
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next] md: bcache: Add missing newlines to logging messages, & misc neatening
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- failed raid5
- From: <i.mikic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Shaohua Li <ShLi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/2]raid5: avoid find discard stripe
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/2]raid5: set bio bi_vcnt 0 for discard request
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Shaohua Li <ShLi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- ANNOUNCE: Einarc 2.0 - hardware RAID management frontend CLI/API
- From: Mikhail Yakshin <greycat.na.kor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- MD RAID5 / XFS filesystem creation error
- From: m d <mikeintel8@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: crypto/xor.c and lib/raid6 to improve raid5/6 performance?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] consistent return types from byteswap macros
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: bcache: Fix wrong check on can_attach_cache
- From: Felipe Pena <felipensp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removable mirror disks?
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Removable mirror disks?
- From: Ethan Tira-Thompson <ethan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removable mirror disks?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Removable mirror disks?
- From: Ethan Tira-Thompson <ethan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 drive raid 5 array with 2 drives down
- From: Eric Smith <eric.d.bald.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- crypto/xor.c and lib/raid6 to improve raid5/6 performance?
- From: xxiao <xiaoxianghua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Art -kwaak- van Breemen <ard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 drive raid 5 array with 2 drives down
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Can running array device name change? - Was: Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 4 drive raid 5 array with 2 drives down
- From: Eric Smith <eric.d.bald.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Art -kwaak- van Breemen <ard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm monitor processes soaking up CPU
- From: Brian Candler <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Be consistent in return types from byteswap macros
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/1] consistent return types from byteswap macros
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD reliability; was: Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD reliability; was: Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- SSD reliability; was: Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
- From: Hristo Chonov <hristochonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: imsm identification problem. mdadm 3.3
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: imsm identification problem. mdadm 3.3
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
- From: Hristo Chonov <chonov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- imsm identification problem. mdadm 3.3
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 scrub
- From: Mark <grimm26@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 scrub
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 scrub
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID10 scrub
- From: Mark Keisler <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing Array (More Devices) - new devices are slightly smaller than the existing drives, unable to shrink array
- From: Matt Callaghan <matt_callaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- exclude assembling arrays with other homehost
- From: Emilio Hodge <whiz@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing Array (More Devices) - new devices are slightly smaller than the existing drives, unable to shrink array
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Growing Array (More Devices) - new devices are slightly smaller than the existing drives, unable to shrink array
- From: Matt Callaghan <matt_callaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] bcache: using for_each_clear_bit to simplify the code
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] tests/10ddf-assemble-missing: new unit test
- [PATCH 6/6] tests/10ddf-incremental-wrong-order: new unit test
- [PATCH 4/6] tests/env-ddf-template: add helper function for checksums
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] tests/10ddf-fail-readd-readonly: new unit test.
- [PATCH 2/3] tests/env-ddf-template: fix container name
- Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Monitor: write meta data in readonly state, sometimes
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] *DO NOT APPLY* DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: "Bradley D. Thornton" <Bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Strange RAID 1 rebuild problem
- From: Andreas Heinlein <aheinlein@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: (Solved) Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] tests/10ddf-fail-readd: New DDF unit test
- [PATCH 2/2] tests/10ddf-fail-stop-readd: New DDF unit test
- Re: (Solved) Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mke2fs with discard option breaks RAID5 array
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- reboot during raid1 resync considered harmful?
- From: Karl Kiniger <karl.kiniger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: P Agenbag <internet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- How to create a near-far array
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: P Agenbag <internet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why hardware RAID controllers when talking about mdadm?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Testing /proc/mdstat parsing
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why hardware RAID controllers when talking about mdadm?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on DDF degraded array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on DDF degraded array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Anomaly with 2 x 840Pro SSDs in software raid 1
- From: Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Anomaly with 2 x 840Pro SSDs in software raid 1
- From: Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 5 Array 3/4 Drives non-fresh
- From: John <linux_mailing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Unable to start RAID5 array
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving drives around for a new one
- From: Jonathan Wilson <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving drives around for a new one
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Remove bashism from Makefile
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Mdadm 3.3 reshape issue
- From: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm 3.3 reshape issue
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mdadm 3.3 reshape issue
- From: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Remove bashism from Makefile
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] DDF: compare_super_ddf: fix sequence number check
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving drives around for a new one
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Monitor: don't set arrays dirty after transition to read-only
- Re: "detect reshape on array start" (was Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3))
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- "detect reshape on array start" (was Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3))
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] DDF tests: allow to run on systems without /dev/sda
- [PATCH 3/3] DDF: compare_super_ddf: fix sequence number check
- [PATCH 2/3] DDF test: make sure mdmon isn't started by systemd
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- mke2fs with discard option breaks RAID5 array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inoperative array shown as "active"
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inoperative array shown as "active"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Inoperative array shown as "active"
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Derek Piper <derek.piper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Moving drives around for a new one
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Derek Piper <derek.piper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Installing openSUSE 12.3 on DDF fake RAID with mdadm
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 回复: [RFC PATCH V3] raid1: rewrite the iobarrier ― Linux RAID Storage
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid5: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: ycbzzjlby <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: fresh drive rebuild always requires a fullsync if interrupted
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: change '%' to condition
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid5: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: change '%' to condition
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- change '%' to condition
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: factor out array name generation
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- md/raid5: fresh drive rebuild always requires a fullsync if interrupted
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] md/raid5: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Managing mdam
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Managing mdam
- From: "Francois Billard" <francois.billard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] bcache: defensively handle format strings
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: Retry R5_ReadNoMerge flag when hit a read error.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Managing mdam
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: Retry R5_ReadNoMerge flag when hit a read error.
- From: ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Andrew Brooks <arb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Managing mdam
- From: Francois Billard <francois.billard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: y b <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: y b <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md update for v3.12
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: handle fake RAIDs with changing subarray UUIDs
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Manage.c: fix small memory leak
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update email for Dan Williams
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Installing SLES11 on DDF fake RAID with mdadm
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: handle fake RAIDs with changing subarray UUIDs
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Jonathan Wilson <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Tudor Holton <tudor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Garðar Arnarsson <gardar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Garðar Arnarsson <gardar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Garðar Arnarsson <gardar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: Tregaron Bayly <tbayly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem halting raid 1
- From: Miguel Corberán Ruiz <migcorrui@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: Andreas Baer <synthetic.gods@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Manage.c: fix small memory leak
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] Fail event during reshape raid5 -> raid6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Question] Fail event during reshape raid5 -> raid6
- From: "Roland 'ValiDOM' Jungnickel" <vali2013@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.3 - A tools for managing md Soft RAID under Linux
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
- From: Nathan Shearer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Failed to find backup of critical section
- From: Nathan Shearer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unmount a raid device during recovery in progress
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Unmount a raid device during recovery in progress
- From: Zoltán Török <torokze@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 with 2 failed drives
- From: "Tsaousis, Costa" <costa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid 5 with 2 failed drives
- From: "Tsaousis, Costa" <costa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: Andreas Baer <synthetic.gods@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] raid1: Add some macros to make code clearly.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] radi1: Relace raise_barrier/lower_barrrier with freeze_array/unfreeze_array for reconfigure the array.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] raid1: Add a filed array_frozen to indicate whether raid in freeze state.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] in_initrd: fix gcc compiler error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: fix gcc -O2 uninitialized warning
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 4/5] raid5: sysfs entry to control worker thread number
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 0/5] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 0/3 v2] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk with backup-file died during reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Disk with backup-file died during reshape
- From: Iruwen <iruwen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Installing CentOS 6.4 on DDF fake RAID with mdadm
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] When hit a read error, retry request with R5_ReadNoMerge flag.
- From: y b <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: Andreas Baer <synthetic.gods@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: <Matthias.Blaesing@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]