Linux RAID Storage Date Index
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df2f2/df2f2a5779fb6d5d09f9f822adb08625e2a87275" alt=""
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: dm-raid45?
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dm-raid45?
- From: Tom Pfeifer <tpfeife1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: Lars Täuber <taeuber@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm No md superblock detected
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Richard Scobie <r.scobie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:答复:md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Thanks Neil
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:答复:md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm No md superblock detected
- From: Teitur Ingi Sigurdsson <teitso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] bcache: fix sparse non static symbol warning
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dm-raid45?
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dm-raid45?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: Pedro Teixeira <finas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID Performance - 5x SSD RAID5
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Slow AVX XOR reported
- From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stuck reshape
- From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: Use conf->device_lock protect changing of multi-thread resources.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stuck reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/1] Recent breakage of DM RAID
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@xxxxxxx>
- Stuck reshape
- From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: Use conf->device_lock protect changing of multi-thread resources.
- From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Taylor <davidt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm No md superblock detected
- From: Teitur Ingi Sigurdsson <teitso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there a tool to examine raw metadata?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unused space before data offset mismatch
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unused space before data offset mismatch
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: James Plank <plank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- unused space before data offset mismatch
- From: kustep <kustep@xxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is there a tool to examine raw metadata?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: James Plank <plank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md updates for 3.13
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is my drive dying ?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is my drive dying ?
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: "reshape: not enough stripes. Needed 65536"
- From: "Steven Rose [DATACOM]" <Steven.Rose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- multiple device failure of mdadm array
- From: kustep <kustep@xxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH -next] dm cache policy mq:: use list_del_init instead of list_del/INIT_LIST_HEAD
- From: Joe Thornber <thornber@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] dm cache policy mq:: use list_del_init instead of list_del/INIT_LIST_HEAD
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- kernel panic with bitmap_startwrite
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] ioatdma: 16-source operation fixes
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] raid6test: add new corner case for ioatdma driver
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] ioatdma: clean up sed pool kmem_cache
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] ioatdma: fix selection of 16 vs 8 source path
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] ioatdma: fix sed pool selection
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] ioatdma: 16-source operation fixes
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix oops when changed group_thread_cnt
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Giovanni Tessore <giotex@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] raid5: Using conf->device_lock protect multi-thread resouce when changed.
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] raid5: Before freeing old multi-thread worker,it should flush them.
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] raid5: Before freeing old multi-thread worker,it should flush them.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] raid5: Using conf->device_lock protect multi-thread resouce when changed.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix oops when changed group_thread_cnt
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: sending ioctl [1261|800c0910] to a partition!
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: sending ioctl [1261|800c0910] to a partition!
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: Using slow_path to release stripe when mmdev->threand is null
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: Using slow_path to release stripe when mmdev->threand is null
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Timeout question
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Kevin Wilson <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: "Baldysiak, Pawel" <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Disk failure questions
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- "Found some drive for an array that is already active"
- From: Arnold Schulz <arnysch@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Timeout question
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Timeout question
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Timeout question
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- high read throughput storage server, take 2
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Seagate black armour recovery
- From: Kevin Wilson <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- More distinct events for mdadm - check vs. error case
- From: Karsten Hohmeier <karsten.hohmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 raid5d multi-thread
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] md raid resync counter
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: drivers: md: include "linux/vmalloc.h" in "dm-cache-policy-hints.c"
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: drivers: md: include "linux/vmalloc.h" in "dm-cache-policy-hints.c"
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid0: Set discard_granularity to correct value after reshape.
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] UAPI: include <asm/byteorder.h> in linux/raid/md_p.h
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: include "linux/vmalloc.h" in "dm-cache-policy-hints.c"
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] UAPI: include <asm/byteorder.h> in linux/raid/md_p.h
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] handle some bugs for REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] block: Check bio can merge before call attempt_plug_merge.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] block: Add REQ_NOMERGE into REQ_COMMON_MASK
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] md/raid5: For stripe with R5_ReadNoMerge, we replace REQ_FLUSH with REQ_NOMERGE.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: John Schmidt <johnschmidt4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: Levente Kurusa <levex@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdadm.8.in
- From: John Schmidt <johnschmidt4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: aac_write: aac_fib_send failed with status: -12
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] UAPI: include <asm/byteorder.h> in linux/raid/md_p.h
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: changing parameters of a running array?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: changing parameters of a running array?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assembling array after disk failure
- From: Dan Knight <dknight1989@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assembling array after disk failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- assembling array after disk failure
- From: Dan Knight <dknight1989@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- aac_write: aac_fib_send failed with status: -12
- From: Steven Haigh <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: re-assembling arrays after severe controller hardware issues...
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- re-assembling arrays after severe controller hardware issues...
- From: Maarten <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: changing parameters of a running array?
- From: Lars Täuber <taeuber@xxxxxxx>
- Enable SCTERC in the kernel?
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can a running MD array name change?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- changing parameters of a running array?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can a running MD array name change?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Can a running MD array name change?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C600 raid
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C600 raid
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Help raid10 recovery from 2 disks removed
- From: <yuji_touya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- C600 raid
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]raid5: set bio bi_vcnt 0 for discard request
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]raid5: set bio bi_vcnt 0 for discard request
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/24] md: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/24] md: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] how to proceed after bad raid5 reshape
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Question] how to proceed after bad raid5 reshape
- From: Dan Knight <dknight1989@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when md_set_badblocks.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: "DeGon, Michael J" <michael.j.degon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Using array without initializing
- From: Hans-Joachim Baader <hjb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when md_set_badblocks.
- From: ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed raid5
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next] md: bcache: Add missing newlines to logging messages, & misc neatening
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- failed raid5
- From: <i.mikic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Linux MD? Or an H710p?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Shaohua Li <ShLi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/2]raid5: avoid find discard stripe
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/2]raid5: set bio bi_vcnt 0 for discard request
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Shaohua Li <ShLi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 trim OOPS / use after free?
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- ANNOUNCE: Einarc 2.0 - hardware RAID management frontend CLI/API
- From: Mikhail Yakshin <greycat.na.kor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- MD RAID5 / XFS filesystem creation error
- From: m d <mikeintel8@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: crypto/xor.c and lib/raid6 to improve raid5/6 performance?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] consistent return types from byteswap macros
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: bcache: Fix wrong check on can_attach_cache
- From: Felipe Pena <felipensp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removable mirror disks?
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Advice recovering from interrupted grow on RAID5 array
- From: John Yates <jyates65@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem diagnosing rebuilding raid5 array
- Re: Removable mirror disks?
- From: Ethan Tira-Thompson <ethan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removable mirror disks?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Removable mirror disks?
- From: Ethan Tira-Thompson <ethan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 drive raid 5 array with 2 drives down
- From: Eric Smith <eric.d.bald.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- crypto/xor.c and lib/raid6 to improve raid5/6 performance?
- From: xxiao <xiaoxianghua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Art -kwaak- van Breemen <ard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 drive raid 5 array with 2 drives down
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Can running array device name change? - Was: Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 4 drive raid 5 array with 2 drives down
- From: Eric Smith <eric.d.bald.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Art -kwaak- van Breemen <ard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm monitor processes soaking up CPU
- From: Brian Candler <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Be consistent in return types from byteswap macros
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/1] consistent return types from byteswap macros
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Broken array, trying to assemble enough to copy data off
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD reliability; was: Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD reliability; was: Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- SSD reliability; was: Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Multiple SSDs - RAID-1, -10, or stacked? TRIM?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
- From: Hristo Chonov <hristochonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: imsm identification problem. mdadm 3.3
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: imsm identification problem. mdadm 3.3
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- RAID 5 : recovery after failure
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Using mdadm instead of dmraid for BIOS-RAID root volume
- From: Brian Candler <b.candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
- From: Hristo Chonov <chonov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: Fix skipping recovery for read-only arrays.
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with Dualboot on a LSI 9271-8i Controller
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- imsm identification problem. mdadm 3.3
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 scrub
- From: Mark <grimm26@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 scrub
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 scrub
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID10 scrub
- From: Mark Keisler <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Help with data recovery - RAID6 with 2 failed drives and another with broken sectors
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing Array (More Devices) - new devices are slightly smaller than the existing drives, unable to shrink array
- From: Matt Callaghan <matt_callaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- exclude assembling arrays with other homehost
- From: Emilio Hodge <whiz@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing Array (More Devices) - new devices are slightly smaller than the existing drives, unable to shrink array
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Growing Array (More Devices) - new devices are slightly smaller than the existing drives, unable to shrink array
- From: Matt Callaghan <matt_callaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Which filesystem for a hybris raid1?
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] bcache: using for_each_clear_bit to simplify the code
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] tests/10ddf-assemble-missing: new unit test
- [PATCH 6/6] tests/10ddf-incremental-wrong-order: new unit test
- [PATCH 4/6] tests/env-ddf-template: add helper function for checksums
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] tests/10ddf-fail-readd-readonly: new unit test.
- [PATCH 2/3] tests/env-ddf-template: fix container name
- Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Monitor: write meta data in readonly state, sometimes
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] *DO NOT APPLY* DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: "Bradley D. Thornton" <Bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Strange RAID 1 rebuild problem
- From: Andreas Heinlein <aheinlein@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: (Solved) Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] tests/10ddf-fail-readd: New DDF unit test
- [PATCH 2/2] tests/10ddf-fail-stop-readd: New DDF unit test
- Re: (Solved) Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mke2fs with discard option breaks RAID5 array
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- reboot during raid1 resync considered harmful?
- From: Karl Kiniger <karl.kiniger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: P Agenbag <internet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- How to create a near-far array
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]