Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/21/2013 11:39 PM, David F. wrote:
> Are you saying that the old obsolete DMRAID should still be used for
> DDF RAID?   What about the 2TiB limit?  I'd rather see modern linux
> RAID support work as good as it does for Windows.

No, I haven't said that. On the contrary, I am actively working on
getting mdadm support for DDF into the main distributions.

I was just wondering about your setup because as far as I know, no
distribution enables mdadm support for DDF. Doing that requires changes
in the distribution's udev rules, intrd/initramfs generation code, and
installer. See my DDF page in the Linux RAID wiki for details.

Regards
Martin


> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11/21/2013 10:10 PM, David F. wrote:
>>> On that DMRAID - they are still yet to try it.  But we do know the
>>> RAID5 works via Int13h interface in real mode and via Windows.  I
>>> think they thought it was a 4 disk array?  I'll ask if they know the
>>> actually number of drives in the RAID configuration.
>>
>> What distribution are these people using? I am not aware of any distro
>> that would activate mdadm for DDF RAID by default.
>>
>> Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux