On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:35:44 -0800 "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FWIW, we confirmed that it appears to be the old RAID1 data it was > finding - when the partition is below half the size it didn't find it > in the partition, when resized just beyond half the size (of the RAID0 > md drive), it then started finding it in the partition. > > Also, was Cisco's information useful for why their cisco server (using > lsi) RAID5 won't assembly? Do you think the patch deals with that as > well? > > You did say something about Cisco in the original post but it wasn't at all clear what you were asking or what the context was. Could you please spell it all out. You said something about dmraid reporting something. Showing the output of dmraid in that case wouldn't hurt. And show the output of "mdadm --examine /dev/device" for any relevant device is often a good idea. NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
