Re: Triple parity and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrea,

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 08:55:08AM +0100, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
> Hi Piergiorgio,
> 
> > How about par2? How does this work?
> I checked the matrix they use, and sometimes it contains some singular
> square submatrix.
> It seems that in GF(2^16) these cases are just less common. Maybe they
> were just unnoticed.
> 
> Anyway, this seems to be an already known problem for PAR2, with an
> hypothetical PAR3 fixing it:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/p/parchive/discussion/96282/thread/d3c6597b/

you did a pretty damn good research work!

Maybe you should consider to contact them too.
I'm not sure if your approach can be extended
to GF(2^16), I guess yes, in that case they
might be interested too.

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux