Re: Triple parity and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/2013 11:05 AM, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
> 
> For the first row with j=0, I use xi = 2^-i and y0 = 0, that results in:
> 

How can xi = 2^-i if x is supposed to be constant?

That doesn't mean that your approach isn't valid, of course, but it
might not be a Cauchy matrix and thus needs additional analysis.

> row j=0 -> 1/(xi+y0) = 1/(2^-i + 0) = 2^i (RAID-6 coefficients)
> 
> For the next rows with j>0, I use yj = 2^j, resulting in:
> 
> rows j>0 -> 1/(xi+yj) = 1/(2^-i + 2^j)

Even more so here... 2^-i and 2^j don't seem to be of the form xi and yj
respectively.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux