Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I believe because the partitions take up the entire provided md device
- so if you don't skew the size of the device to protect the meta
data, the partition could go to the end of the drive.

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The question I have is why is there IMSM meta data on sdc2 at all?
> IMSM metadata sit at the end of a block device. So I figure that sdc2 is
> the last partition, and by some wird circumstance it's so large that it
> includes the last sectors of the physical disk where the metadata
> resides. That would be a bad idea, a dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc2 would
> wipe not only the partition but also the RAID meta data.
>
> Martin
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux