On 10/21/2013 7:36 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: > First of all, thank you Stan, Mikael, and John for your replies. > > Stan, > > I had made a private bet with myself that Stan Hoeppner would be the > first to respond to my query. And I was not disappointed. In fact, I was > hoping for advice from you. No need to bet. Just assume. ;) > We're getting the 7 yr hardware support > contract from Dell, Insane, 7 years is. Exist then, Dell may not. Clouded, Dell's future is. > and I'm a little concerned about "finger-pointing" > issues with regards to putting in a non-Dell SAS controller. Then use a Dell HBA. They're all LSI products anyway, and have been since the mid 90s when Dell re-badged their first AMI MegaRAID cards as "Power Edge RAID Controller". The PERC H310 is a no-cache RAID HBA, i.e. a fancy SAS/SATA HBA with extremely low performance firmware based RAID5. Its hardware RAID1/10 performance isn't bad, and allows booting from an array device sans teh headaches of booting md based RAID. It literally is the Dell OEM LSI 9240-8i, identical but for Dell branded firmware and the PCB. You can use it it JBOD mode, i.e. as a vanilla SAS/SATA HBA. See page 43: ftp://ftp.dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_dell_adapters/poweredge-rc-h310_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.pdf You can also use it in mixed mode, configuring two disk drives as a hardware RAID1 set, and booting from it, and configuring the other drives as non-virtual disks, i.e. standalone drives for md/RAID use. This requires 8 drives if you want a 6 disk md/RAID10. Why, you ask? Because you cannot intermix hardware RAID and software RAID on any given drive, obviously. Frankly, if you plan to buy only 6 drives for a single RAID10 volume, there is no reason to use md/RAID at all. It will provide no advantage for your stated application, as the firmware RAID executes plenty fast enough on the LSISAS2008 ASIC of the H310 to handle the striping/mirroring of 6 disks, with no appreciable decrease in IOPS. Though for another $190 you can have the H710 with 512MB NVWC. The extra 512MB of the 710P won't gain you anything, yet costs an extra $225. The $190 above the H310 is a great investment for the occasion that your UPS takes a big dump and downs the server. With the H310 you will lose data, corrupting users' Gnome config files, and possibly suffer filesystem corruption. The H710 will also give a bump to write IOPS, i.e. end user responsiveness with your workload. All things considered, my advice is to buy the H710 at $375 and use hardware RAID10 on 6 disks. Make /boot, root, /home, etc on the single RAID disk device. I didn't give you my advice in my first reply, as you seemed set on using md. > Network > card? No problem. But drive controller? Forgive me for "white-knuckling" > on this a bit. But I have gotten an OK to order the server with both the > H710p and the mystery "SAS 6Gbps HBA External Controller [$148.55]" for Note "External". You don't know what an SFF8088 port is. See: http://www.backupworks.com/productimages/lsilogic/lsias9205-8e.jpg You do not plan to connect an MD1200/1220/3200 JBOD chassis. You don't need, nor want, this "External" SAS HBA. > which no one at Dell seems to be able to tell me the pedigree. So I can It's a Dell OEM card, sourced from LSI. But for $150 I'd say it's a 4 port card, w/ single SFF8088 connector. Doesn't matter. You can't use it. > configure both ways and see which I like. Again, you'll need 8 drives for the md solution. > I do find that 1GB NV cache > with barriers turned off to be attractive. Make sure you use kernel 3.0.0 or later, and edit fstab with inode64 mount option, as well as nobarrier. > But hey, this is going to be a very nice opportunity for observing XFS's > savvy with parallel i/o. And I'm looking forward to it. Well given that you've provided zero detail about the workload in this thread I can't comment. > BTW, it's the > problematic COBOL Point of Sale app Oh God... you're *that* guy? ;) > that didn't do fsyncs that is being > migrated to its Windows-only MS-SQL version in the virtualized instance Ok, so now we have the reason for the Windows VM and MSSQL. > of Windows 2008 Server. At least it will be a virtualized instance on > this server if I get my way. Did you happen to notice during your virtual machine educational excursions that fsync is typically treated as a noop by many hypervisors? I'd definitely opt for a persistent cache RAID controller. > Essentially, our core business is moving > from Linux to Windows in this move. C'est la vie. I did my best. NCR won. It's really difficult to believe POS vendors are moving away from some of the most proprietary, and secure (if not just obscure) systems on the planet, for decades running System/36, AT&T SYS V, SCO, Linux, and now to... Windows? -- Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
