Re: ISW fakeraid: fail to add back a disk previously removed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Neil,

So far now answer, I'm adding you in the thread since it seems a
critical issue, hope you don't mind.

Thanks

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> [ Adding Dan Williams in CC since it appears to be the author of the
> intel fake raid support. ]
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm testing ISW fake-raid with mdadm 3.3 and I can't add back a disk
>> to a container previously marked as failed and removed.
>>
>> Also I'm testing ISW inside a VM so I'm not sure my test case is valid.
>>
>> So basically my ISW array was created with dmraid. I then installed my
>> system on this array and rebooted to switch to mdadm. So far so good
>> everything seems to work perfectly:
>>
>> # export IMSM_NO_PLATFORM=1
>>
>> # cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [raid1]
>> md126 : active raid1 sda[1] sdb[0]
>>       2092375 blocks super external:/md127/0 [2/2] [UU]
>>
>> md127 : inactive sda[1](S) sdb[0](S)
>>       6306 blocks super external:imsm
>>
>> unused devices: <none>
>>
>> # mdadm -E /dev/sdb
>> /dev/sdb:
>>           Magic : Intel Raid ISM Cfg Sig.
>>         Version : 1.1.00
>>     Orig Family : ef92cdd9
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Now I'm marking sda as failed and remove it:
>>
>> # mdadm --fail /dev/md126 sda
>> # mdadm --remove /dev/md127 sda
>>
>> everything works fine until I add back sda to the container:
>>
>> # mdadm --add /dev/md127 /dev/sda
>> mdadm: add /dev/sda
>>
>> # cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [raid1]
>> md126 : active raid1 sdb[0]
>>       2092375 blocks super external:/md127/0 [2/1] [_U]
>>
>> md127 : inactive sda[1](S) sdb[0](S)
>>       6306 blocks super external:imsm
>>
>> sda is not added anymore to the array md126 and therefore no resynchro happens.
>>
>> # mdadm -E /dev/sda
>> /dev/sda:
>>    MBR Magic : aa55
>> Partition[0] :      3612577 sectors at         2048 (type 83)
>> Partition[1] :       560133 sectors at      3616767 (type 05)
>>
>> Could anybody tell me if that's expected and if so could you englight me ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Francis
>
>
>
> --
> Francis



-- 
Francis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux