Hello Martin On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I have spent a few days thinking about the problem of incremental > container assembly when disk sequence numbers (aka event counters) don't > match, and how mdadm/mdmon should behave in various situations. > Before I start coding on this, I'd like to get your opinion - I may be > overlooking something important. I was really suprised to see that this functionnality needs to be implemented since in my understanding, it's the most important one, at least for RAID1. Isn't this already implemented for IMSM ? If so can't we use the same strategy ? If not, isn't dmraid supporting it ? If so can't we use the same strategy ? Thanks -- Francis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
