Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:09:05 -0800
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAGRSmLtfL+Pzcy0CdfvUpcX3Z90-wEVTg46Q2iFRbJsxuSeyBQ@mail.gmail.com>

They also said: RAID 5 with 4 physical drives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.

References:
- MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: Martin Wilck
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: NeilBrown
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: Martin Wilck
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: NeilBrown
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: NeilBrown
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: NeilBrown
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: Martin Wilck
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
  - From: David F.

Prev by Date: Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
Next by Date: mdadm No md superblock detected
Previous by thread: Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
Next by thread: Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux