Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: off - info about servers and linux mail lists
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- off - info about servers and linux mail lists
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fix apparent cut-and-paste error in super_90_validate
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fix apparent cut-and-paste error in super_90_validate
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] radi1: Relace raise_barrier/lower_barrrier with freeze_array/unfreeze_array for reconfigure the array.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] raid1: Add a filed freeze_array to indicate whether raid in freeze state.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/3 V2] Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier for raid1.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: <Matthias.Blaesing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does the chunk size of RAID5 really mean the "smallest atomic" mass of data?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Does the chunk size of RAID5 really mean the "smallest atomic" mass of data?
- From: taejin1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid5: a problem of repeat recovery
- From: wangkaird <wangkaird@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] DDF: export_examine_super_ddf: print MD_DEVICES
- [PATCH 5/6] in_initrd: fix gcc compiler error
- [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- [PATCH 4/6] DDF: increase default value for safe_mode_delay to 4000ms
- [PATCH 0/6] Fixes for installation of CentOS 6 on DDF BIOS RAID
- [PATCH 1/6] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: fix gcc -O2 uninitialized warning
- [PATCH 3/6] DDF: container_content_ddf: set safe_mode_delay > 0
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <qindehua@xxxxxxx>
- Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: <Matthias.Blaesing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID problem
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID problem
- From: fixitdad5@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Ed L Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/3] wait: add wait_event_cmd()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/3] raid5: rename stripe_hash()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 0/3] raid5: relieve lock contention of get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/3 v2] raid5: sysfs entry to control worker thread number
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/3 v2] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/3 v2] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 0/3 v2] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 18/22] block: Generic bio chaining
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 read io balancing algorithm
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 read io balancing algorithm
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 read io balancing algorithm
- From: <struhlo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: handling of missing disks in DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF test fails if default udev rules are active
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tests/10ddf-fail-two-spares: new unit test
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID: add tilegx SIMD implementation of raid6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: handling of missing disks in DDF
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RFC: handling of missing disks in DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/22] bcache: Kill unaligned bvec hack
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/22] block: Consolidate duplicated bio_trim() implementations
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/22] block: Use rw_copy_check_uvector()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/22] block: Convert bio_iovec() to bvec_iter
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/22] block: Convert bio_copy_data() to bvec_iter
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/22] block: Immutable bio vecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/22] bio-integrity: Convert to bvec_iter
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/22] block: Kill bio_segments()/bi_vcnt usage
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/22] dm: Use bvec_iter for dm_bio_record()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/22] block: Convert drivers to immutable biovecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/22] rbd: Refactor bio cloning, don't clone biovecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 19/22] block: Rename bio_split() -> bio_pair_split()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 18/22] block: Generic bio chaining
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/22] block: Remove bi_idx hacks
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/22] ceph: Convert to immutable biovecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 20/22] block: Introduce new bio_split()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 21/22] block: Kill bio_pair_split()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/22] block: Kill bio_iovec_idx(), __bio_iovec()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 22/22] block: Don't save/copy bvec array anymore, share when cloning
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tests/10ddf-fail-two-spares: new unit test
- [PATCH] RAID: add tilegx SIMD implementation of raid6
- From: Ken Steele <ken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF: regression caused by 273989b9 / ce45c819
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail on RAID0 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF test fails if default udev rules are active
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] tests/10ddf-fail-spare: more sophisticated result checks
- [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
- [PATCH 8/9] DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray
- [PATCH 7/9] tests/10ddf-fail-create-race: test handling of fail/create race
- Patches related to current discussion
- mdadm --fail on RAID0 array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- DDF: regression caused by 273989b9 / ce45c819
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: Dong Wu <archer.wudong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] test: allow LVM volumes or RAM disks as test devices
- [PATCH 4/5] DDF: get_extents: don't allocate space on failed disks
- [PATCH 3/5] tests/10ddf-fail-spare: new unit test
- [PATCH 2/5] tests/10ddf-fail-twice: remove hard-coded assumptions
- [PATCH 1/5] tests/env-ddf-template: some helper functions
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: "archer.wudong" <archer.wudong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: let mdmon know the layout
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_process_update: delete removed disks from dlist
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: help needed restoring data
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- help needed restoring data
- From: Uwe Wächter <uwe.waechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_process_update: delete removed disks from dlist
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: let mdmon know the layout
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] tests/10ddf-fail-twice: New unit test
- [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_process_update: delete removed disks from dlist
- [PATCH 2/4] DDF: no need for GET_LAYOUT any more
- [PATCH 1/4] mdmon: always get layout from sysfs
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: Christian Nilsson <nikize@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tests/env-ddf-template: helper for new unit test
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tests/env-ddf-template: helper for new unit test
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Two bug fixes and a lot of debug code
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: Christian Nilsson <nikize@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid double close()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/10] mdmon: manage_member: fix race condition during slow meta data writes
- [PATCH 10/10] tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild: new unit test for DDF
- [PATCH 07/10] mdmon: wait_and_act: fix debug message for SIGUSR1
- [PATCH 05/10] DDF: ddf_set_disk: add some debug messages
- [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called
- [PATCH 08/10] mdmon: manage_member: debug messages for array state
- [PATCH 03/10] DDF: ddf_process_update: log offsets for conf changes
- [PATCH 04/10] DDF: load_ddf_header: more error logging
- [PATCH 01/10] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: bugfix for 62ff3c40
- [PATCH 02/10] DDF: log disk status changes more nicely
- [PATCH 00/10] Two bug fixes and a lot of debug code
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Avoid double close()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- [patch 2/3] raid5: sysfs entry to control worker thread number
- [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- [patch 0/3] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- Re: Recovery possible after partial reshape failure?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Basic hotspare handling for RAID10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch]raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery help? 4-disk RAID5 double-failure, but good disks have event count mismatch.
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Recovery help? 4-disk RAID5 double-failure, but good disks have event count mismatch.
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] 2 more bug fixes for md in 3.11
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] DDF: find_vdcr: fix minor bug in debug message
- [PATCH 4/4] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: fix metadata update for SVDs
- [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: only activate good drives
- [PATCH 2/4] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: Add RAID10 code
- [PATCH 0/4] Basic hotspare handling for RAID10
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch]raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <qindehua@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: Christian Iversen <chrivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] md: set write-intent bit first in sync-bitmap for rwm in non-insync region.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] DDF: safe big-endian types
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <qindehua@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] mdadm: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2 v2] md: set write-intent bit first in sync-bitmap for rwm in non-insync region.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] DDF: add endian-safe typedefs
- [PATCH 2/6] DDF: convert big endian to be32 type
- [PATCH 4/6] DDF: convert big-endian __u16 to be16 type
- [PATCH 5/6] DDF: add_other_bvd: fix endianness bug
- [PATCH 3/6] DDF: convert big-endian __u64 to be64 type
- [PATCH 6/6] DDF: ddf_set_disk: fix minor endianness bug
- [RFC/PATCH 0/6] DDF: safe big-endian types
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: --assemble --scan --no-degrades assembles+run degraded RAID1?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- --assemble --scan --no-degrades assembles+run degraded RAID1?
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] tests/10ddf-geometry: new unit test
- [PATCH 2/6] DDF: kill_subarray_ddf: fix case without mdmon running
- [PATCH 5/6] test: increase number of devices to 13
- [PATCH 4/6] tests/10ddf-create: create RAID5 first
- [PATCH 1/6] DDF: err_bad_md_layout: fix return value
- [PATCH 3/6] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: fix offset calculation for SVDs
- [PATCH 0/6] More DDF fixes and unit tests
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- md raid across physical servers?
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disks supporting ERC?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disks supporting ERC?
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hlep hardware selection
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] 3 md bug fixes for 3.11 (and 3.10.y)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Hlep hardware selection
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] DDF: factor out writing super block to single disk
- [PATCH 2/3] DDF: make "null_aligned" a static buffer
- [PATCH 1/3] DDF: increase seq number in ddf_set_updates_pending
- Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <13691222965@xxxxxxx>
- Problem with disk replacement
- From: Qin Dehua <qindehua@xxxxxxxxx>
- md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- write-mostly vs. write-behind
- From: Michael Heide <lkml662@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backup file size when migrating from raid5 to raid6?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Scrubbing "check" not working for RAID10 in 3.10-rc1+
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backup file size when migrating from raid5 to raid6?
- From: Boyan Alexiev <alexiev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: David Lang <david@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Scrubbing "check" not working for RAID10 in 3.10-rc1+
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery possible after partial reshape failure?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery possible after partial reshape failure?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Scrubbing "check" not working for RAID10 in 3.10-rc1+
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Scrubbing "check" not working for RAID10 in 3.10-rc1+
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: add bio_rewind() to reset bio_vec
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- LVM mirroring versus MD Raid 1
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery possible after partial reshape failure?
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Recovery possible after partial reshape failure?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 3.10: discard/trim support on md-raid1?
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch -next] bcache: check for allocation failures
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Priya Kamala <priya.kamala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Priya Kamala <priya.kamala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Priya Kamala <priya.kamala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding disk failure
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Query regarding disk failure
- From: Priya Kamala <priya.kamala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re-shape raid0 acts up
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re-shape raid0 acts up
- From: Ole Tange <tange@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining if a stripe/RAID0 has failed
- From: Curtis <serverascode@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining if a stripe/RAID0 has failed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Determining if a stripe/RAID0 has failed
- From: Curtis <serverascode@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extending a 4×3Tb RAID10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Extending a 4×3Tb RAID10
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md: raid1: use bio_rewind() before bio_copy_data()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 39/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: Fix updates for SVDs
- [PATCH 38/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: some more debug messages
- [PATCH 37/39] DDF: guid_str: more readable output
- [PATCH 36/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: add debug messages fore adding VDs
- [PATCH 35/39] DDF: add debug message in add_super_ddf_bvd
- [PATCH 34/39] DDF: fix endianness of refnum in debug messages
- [PATCH 33/39] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: fix raid_disk calculation
- [PATCH 32/39] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: identify disk by refnum
- [PATCH 31/39] DDF: implement kill_subarray
- [PATCH 30/39] DDF: write_init_super_ddf: don't zero superblocks for subarrays
- [PATCH 29/39] Monitor: Don't write metadata in inactive array state
- [PATCH 28/39] test/10-ddf-create: fix comments
- Fixes for the DDF patch series
- Re: [PATCH 11/27] DDF: layout_ddf2md: new DDF->md RAID layout conversion
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/27] DDF: find_vdcr: account for secondary RAID level
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/27] DDF: load_ddf_headers: use secondary header as fallback
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md: raid1: use bio_rewind() before bio_copy_data()
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] block: add bio_rewind() to reset bio_vec
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF/RAID10 patch series
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/27] DDF: layout_ddf2md: new DDF->md RAID layout conversion
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/27] DDF: layout_md2ddf: new md->DDF layout conversion
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/27] DDF: find_vdcr: account for secondary RAID level
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/27] DDF: load_ddf_headers: use secondary header as fallback
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ignoring X as it reports Y as failed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ignoring X as it reports Y as failed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Extending an existing RAID (10) array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extending an existing RAID (10) array
- From: Christian <CvB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm ignoring X as it reports Y as failed
- From: "Marek Jaros" <mjaros1@xxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID (OT)
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Aren't 2TB+ disk sizes supposed to be standardized?
- From: Kai Stian Olstad <kai.stian.olstad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID (OT)
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID (OT)
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Aren't 2TB+ disk sizes supposed to be standardized?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch -next] bcache: check for allocation failures
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Aren't 2TB+ disk sizes supposed to be standardized?
- From: Tudor Holton <tudor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general questions on RAID
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- some general questions on RAID
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- question about the best suited RAID level/layout
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF/RAID10 patch series
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md updates for 3.10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Extending an existing RAID (10) array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 19/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: Use same amount of workspace as other disks
- [PATCH 02/27] DDF: check_secondary: fix treatment of missing BVDs
- [PATCH 12/27] DDF: layout_md2ddf: new md->DDF layout conversion
- [PATCH 03/27] DDF: load_ddf_headers: use secondary header as fallback
- [PATCH 16/27] DDF: use LBA_OFFSET macro instead of lba_offset field
- [PATCH 09/27] DDF: get_svd_state: Status logic for secondary RAID level
- [PATCH 26/27] DDF: ddf_process_update: Fix vlist treatment for SVDs
- [PATCH 14/27] DDF: init_super_ddf_bvd: initialize other bvds
- [PATCH 13/27] DDF: Simplify allocation of "other BVDs"
- [PATCH 10/27] DDF: allow empty slots in virt disk table
- [PATCH 08/27] DDF: ddf_set_disk: move status logic to separate function
- [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf
- [PATCH 24/27] DDF: ddf_set_array_state: more meaningful output
- [PATCH 06/27] DDF: ddf_open_new: implement minimal consistency check
- [PATCH 11/27] DDF: layout_ddf2md: new DDF->md RAID layout conversion
- [PATCH 04/27] DDF: handle "open flag" according to spec
- [PATCH 27/27] tests/10ddf-create: add RAID 10 array
- [PATCH 25/27] DDF: ddf_process_update: handle update of conf records for SVD
- [PATCH 22/27] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: lba_offset calculation for RAID10
- [PATCH 23/27] DDF: guid_str: convenience function to print GUID for debugging
- [PATCH 21/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf_bvd: use get_svd_state()
- [PATCH 20/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: RAID10 changes
- [PATCH 18/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: allow empty slots in phys disk table
- [PATCH 17/27] DDF: get_extents: support secondary RAID level
- [PATCH 15/27] DDF: validate_geometry_ddf: support RAID10
- [PATCH 07/27] DDF: find_vdcr: account for secondary RAID level
- [PATCH 01/27] DDF (cleanup): use a common macro for failed searches
- DDF/RAID10 patch series
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Extending an existing RAID (10) array
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Remember the last sync operation that was performed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] select_devices: fix scanning of container members with dev list
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in: Fix typo: previous -> previously
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in: Fix typo: previous -> previously
- From: Wieland Hoffmann <themineo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH v1] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug in kernel 3.2 (up to date Debian wheezy)
- From: Nicolas Jungers <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 growth of version 1.1/1.2 metadata violates least surprise.
- From: "Dr. Greg Wettstein" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Detail: Add container device to device list
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] select_devices: fix scanning of container members with dev list
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] select_devices: fix scanning of container members with dev list
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- bug in kernel 3.2 (up to date Debian wheezy)
- From: Nicolas Jungers <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Nicolas Jungers <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Trivial PATCH] removing doubled description for sync_max, merging it within sync_min/sync_max
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [Trivial PATCH] removing doubled description for sync_max, merging it within sync_min/sync_max
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Remember the last sync operation that was performed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1] mdadm: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Scrubbing "check" not working for RAID10 in 3.10-rc1+
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MD: Remember the last sync operation that was performed
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Scrubbing "check" not working for RAID10 in 3.10-rc1+
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 growth of version 1.1/1.2 metadata violates least surprise.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Raid1 when all drives failed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] Makefile: Allow the user to pass EXTRA_CFLAGS
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Detail: deterministic ordering in --brief --verbose
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] select_devices: fix scanning of container members with dev list
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Snapshotting RAID1
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 growing interrupted, array won't assemble or resume growing
- From: Nic Wolfe <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delete and re-purpose a mdadm raid partition
- From: Jonathan Wilson <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] Detail: deterministic ordering in --brief --verbose
- [PATCH 1/2] select_devices: fix scanning of container members with dev list
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Detail: deterministic ordering in --brief --verbose
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing a 5-drive RAID6 - some initial questions
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing a 5-drive RAID6 - some initial questions
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delete and re-purpose a mdadm raid partition
- From: Jonathan Wilson <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Caspar Smit <c.smit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with Raid1 when all drives failed
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Bug: Different data offsets while reshaping scrambles data
- From: Benjamin Meier <post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with Raid1 when all drives failed
- From: "Baldysiak, Pawel" <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 growing interrupted, array won't assemble or resume growing
- From: Nic Wolfe <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Growing a 5-drive RAID6 - some initial questions
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 growing interrupted, array won't assemble or resume growing
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] Makefile: Allow the user to pass EXTRA_CFLAGS
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 growing interrupted, array won't assemble or resume growing
- From: Nic Wolfe <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimal value for bitmap-chunk option
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] Makefile: Allow the user to pass EXTRA_CFLAGS
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Caspar Smit <c.smit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Caspar Smit <c.smit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Proper way to delete an old RAID1?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Set AUTOCHECK=false
- From: Роман Алексеев <r.alekseev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Optimal value for bitmap-chunk option
- From: Роман Алексеев <r.alekseev@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] raid6check: Fix memory leaks detected by valgrind
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] raid6check: Check return value of lseek64()
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] raid6check: Fix compiler warnings.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] Makefile: Allow the user to pass EXTRA_CFLAGS
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] raid6check: Use enums for repair type
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] raid6check: Fix build of raid6check
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- UDEV Rule for Timeouts
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --assemble considers event count for spares
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Please assist with missing RAID 5 array.
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Please assist with missing RAID 5 array.
- From: Christopher Caruk <caruk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 5: low sequential write performance?
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Trivial PATCH 00/33] Remove uses of typedef ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Trivial PATCH 13/33] md: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md bug fixes for 3.10-rc and -stable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md bug fixes for 3.10-rc and -stable
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md bug fixes for 3.10-rc and -stable
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] DM RAID: validate_raid_redundancy: Silence uninitialized variable warning
- From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] DM RAID: validate_raid_redundancy: Silence uninitialized variable warning
- From: Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi: Check if the device support WRITE_SAME_10
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Barrett Lewis <barrett.lewis.mitsi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG - raid 1 deadlock on handle_read_error / wait_barrier
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG - raid 1 deadlock on handle_read_error / wait_barrier
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAD1 doesn't fail WRITE that was written only on a rebuilding drive
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Prevent Autodetection
- From: Richard Laager <rlaager@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: mismatches in raid1, clarification please
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: mismatches in raid1, clarification please
- From: Andrew Brooks <arb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: mismatches in raid1, clarification please
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: mismatches in raid1, clarification please
- From: Andrew Brooks <arb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: "Vanhorn, Mike" <michael.vanhorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Prevent Autodetection
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Prevent Autodetection
- From: Richard Laager <rlaager@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Prevent Autodetection
- From: Richard Laager <rlaager@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: Keith Phillips <spootsy.ootsy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enlarging device of linear array
- From: Ramon Hofer <ramonhofer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration
- From: Keith Phillips <spootsy.ootsy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD + Rust as raid1
- From: Dominic Raferd <dominic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
- From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]