We should skip known failed disks when allocating space for
new arrays. This fixes the problem with 10ddf-fail-spare.
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
---
super-ddf.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super-ddf.c b/super-ddf.c
index b352a52..23438b7 100644
--- a/super-ddf.c
+++ b/super-ddf.c
@@ -2390,7 +2390,10 @@ static struct extent *get_extents(struct ddf_super *ddf, struct dl *dl)
struct extent *rv;
int n = 0;
unsigned int i;
-
+ __u16 state = be16_to_cpu(ddf->phys->entries[dl->pdnum].state);
+ if ((state & (DDF_Online|DDF_Failed|DDF_Missing)) != DDF_Online)
+ return NULL;
+
rv = xmalloc(sizeof(struct extent) * (ddf->max_part + 2));
for (i = 0; i < ddf->max_part; i++) {
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
