Re: shown disk sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 06:57 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> New feature in 3.3 is that when you reshape (e.g.) a RAID5 to a RAID6 it can
> do so without using a "backup file" - which is are a pain to work with and
> slow things down a lot.
> What it does instead is move the "data_offset" towards the start of the
> device.  That way it is never writing onto live data, and so no backup is
> needed.
So you are stealing my precious space, which I was paying soo much money
for?! ;-)

Seriously,... sounds like a good idea... :)
But why does it also increase the "gap" at the end? Guess the whole
"gap" at the end thingy is something we will never ever really get rid
of, will we? I mean it's no problem because of some missing sectors...
it just makes like more complicated when doing manual geometry
calculations...


While talking about data_offset... is it planned to implement a way to
add a way to specify the data_offset manually  and/or specify a
data_offset_offset (i.e. a additional offset to what mdadm would have
autodetected... similar as LVM allows?

I mean the practical relevance is probably not that much... but manual
specification would probably needed whenever you have some more complex
block layer (e.g. LVM), another MD or a hardware RAID below MD... and
you want to align to the stripes... or unusual large chunk sizes...

I've seen that you have some branch where you can specify the offset for
each device... but... guess that was only for some guys to do recovery
works?!



Thanks,
Chris.

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux